The Cartesian Dispute as a Key to Study the Philosophical Relationship between Spinoza and Leibniz

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69498/ri.2025.22.554

Keywords:

Cartesianism, MechanismSubstance, Reception

Abstract

This article examines the philosophical relationship between Spinoza and Leibniz within the framework of discussions on Cartesianism. It proposes a historical-philosophical itinerary that begins with radical Cartesianism and explores Leibniz’s interpretation of Spinoza in a context shaped by anti-Cartesian reactions and accusations of Spinozism. The article also investigates the reception of this relationship from the late seventeenth century to the present, highlighting the divergent interpretations that have emerged over time. We argue that Leibniz’s critique of Spinoza’s system not only reflects his rejection of Spinoza’s theological-political commitments but also constitutes a programmatic response to Descartes and his followers, as well as to the “radical Cartesianism” in which Spinoza was embedded.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Leila Jabase, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - Argentina

Leila Jabase es licenciada y doctora en Filosofía por la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina. Es especialista en el pensamiento de Spinoza y Leibniz, y ha publicado artículos en revistas académicas de prestigio. Integra las cátedras de Filosofía Moderna y Ética I en la misma universidad, donde también colabora en la enseñanza de seminarios especializados. Asimismo, forma parte de equipos de investigación en el Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades (CIFFyH-UNC), enfocados en la filosofía moderna. Ha recibido diversas becas de investigación, entre ellas la Beca Doctoral SECyT-UNC y la Beca Interna de Finalización de Doctorado del CONICET. Su tesis doctoral abordó el problema de la individuación en Spinoza y Leibniz, con especial énfasis en los conceptos de cuerpo y substancia. En la actualidad, investiga las formulaciones de la relación uno-múltiple en la modernidad temprana, centrándose en las conexiones filosóficas entre Spinoza, Leibniz y Tschirnhaus.

References

Adams, Robert M., Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994.

Arthur, Richard T.W., "Introduction" en Arthur, Richard T.W. (ed. y trad.), The Labyrinth of the Continuum: Writings on the Continuum Problem, 1672-1686, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2001, pp. xxiii-lxxxviii.

Baruzi, Jean, Leibniz et l'organisation religieuse de la terre, París, Félix Alcan, 1907.

Bayle, Pierre, Diccionario histórico y crítico. Selección, Buenos Aires, El Cuenco de Plata, 2010.

Beiser, Frederick, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987.

Belaval, Yvon, "Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza," Archives de Philosophie, Nº46,1983, pp. 531-552.

Bell, David, Spinoza in Germany from 1670 to the Age of Goethe, London, Institute of Germanic Studies, University of London, 1984.

Bredenburg, Johannes, Enervatio Tractatus Theologico-Politici, una cum demonstratione, geometrico ordine disposita, Naturam non esse Deum, Rotterdam, 1675.

Brown, Stuart, "The Proto-Monadology of the De Summa Rerum" en Brown, Stuart, The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646-1676), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999, pp. 263-288.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3507-0_13

Bunge, Wiep van, Spinoza Past and Present: Essays on Spinoza, Spinozism, and Spinoza Scholarship, Leiden, Brill, 2012.

Cabañas, Leticia, Esquisabel, Oscar (eds.), Leibniz frente a Spinoza. Una interpretación panorámica, Granada, Comares/UCA, 2014.

Fazio, Rodolfo, "Leibniz lector de la Ética: el papel de Spinoza en la reforma leibniziana de la noción de substancia", Ideas. Revista de filosofía moderna y contemporánea, Nº3, 2016, pp. 86-108.

Fichant, Michel, "Les concepts fondamentaux de la mécanique selon Leibniz en 1676", en Heinekamp, Albert y Mettler, Dieter (eds.), Leibniz à Paris (1672-1676). Tome 1: Les Sciences, Wiesbaden, Steiner Verlag, 1978, pp. 219-232.

Förster, Eckart, Melamed, Yitzhak Y., "Introduction" en Förster, Eckart y Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (eds.), Benedictus de Spinoza and German Idealism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135139

Friedmann, Georges, Leibniz et Spinoza, Paris, Gallimard, 1946.

Foucher de Careil, Louis A, Réfutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz, précédée d'un mémoire, Paris, Briere, 1854.

---, "Introduction" en Foucher de Careil, Louis Alexandre (ed.), Nouvelles Lettres et Opuscules inédits de Leibniz, Paris, Auguste Durand, 1857.

Goldembaum, Ursula, "Transubstantiation, Physics and Philosophy at the Time of the Catholic Demonstrations," en Brown, Stuart (ed.), The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, p. 92.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3507-0_5

Gootjes, Albert, "The First Orchestrated Attack on Spinoza: Johannes Melchioris and the Cartesian Network in Utrecht," Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 79, No. 1 (2018), pp. 23-43.

https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2018.0001

Groot Placaet-Boek vervattende de placaten... van de Staten Generael der Vereenigde Nederlanden ende van de... Staten van Holkndt, III, 's Gravenhage, 1658-1796, 9 vols., p. 523-54.

Hart, Alan, "Leibniz on Spinoza's Concept of Substance" en Studia Leibnitiana, vol. 14, no. 1, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1982, pp. 73-86.

Hofmann, Joseph E. Leibniz In Paris 1672-1676. His Growth to Mathematical Maturity, Londres, Cambridge University Press, 1974.

Israel, Jonathan, La ilustración radical. La filosofía y la construcción de la modernidad, 1650-1750, Ciudad de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2017, pp. 351-533.

---, "The Banning of Spinoza's Works in the Dutch Republic (1670-1678)," en Bunge, Wiep van y Klever, Willem (eds.), Disguised and Overt Spinozism around 1700, Leiden, Brill, 1995, pp. 3-14.

---, The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn, 1785.

Kolakowski, Leszek, Chrétiens sans église: La conscience réligieuse et le lien confessionnel au 17e siècle, Paris, Gallimard, 1969, pp. 206-225.

Krop, Henri, "Spinoza and the Calvinistic Cartesianism of Lambertus van Velthuysen," en Studia Spinozana, Vol. 15, Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2006, pp. 107-132.

Kulstad, Mark, "Did Leibniz Incline Toward Monistic Pantheism in 1676?" en VI Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress: Leibniz und Europa, Hannover, Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, 1994, pp. 424-428.

Lærke, Mogens, Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. La genèse d'une opposition complexe, Paris, Honoré Champion, 2008.

Lange, J. Joachim, Causa Dei et religionis naturalis adversus atheismum, Halle Saxonum, 1727. [Facsímil en Wolff, Christian, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 3/17, Hildesheim, Georg Olms Verlag, 1984.]

Leibniz, Gottfried W., Leibniz-Thomasius. Correspondance 1663-1672, Richard Bodéüs (ed.), París, Vrin, 1993 (LT).

---, Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. C.I. Gerhardt, 7 vols., Berlin, Weidmann, 1875-1890 (GP).

---, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1923- (A).

---, Leibniz-Thomasius: Correspondance 1663-1672, ed. Richard Bodéüs, París, Vrin, 1993.

Malebranche, Nicolas, Oeuvres, 2 vols., Paris, Gallimard, 1979-1992.

Meinsma, Koenraad O., Spinoza et son cercle: étude critique historique sur les hétérodoxes hollandais, Paris, Vrin, 1983.

Mendelssohn, Moses, Debate sobre Spinoza, Solé, María Jimena (trad.), Córdoba, Encuentro Grupo Editor, 2010.

Mercer, Christia, "Leibniz and Spinoza on Substance and Mode" en Pereboom, Derk (ed.), The Rationalists: Critical Essays on Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield, 1999, pp. 273-300.

---, Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origin and Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Moreau, Pierre-François y Lærke, Mogens, "Spinoza's Reception" en Garrett, Don (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 405-443.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316156186.012

Morfino, Vittorio, "Lo spinozismo di Leibniz. Linee di una ricostruzione delle storia della questione" en ACME, vol. 49, no. 3, 1996, pp. 55-82.

Melchioris, Johannes, Epistola ad amicum, contiens censuram libri, cui titulus: Tractatus theologico-politicus, Utrecht, Cornelius Noenaert, 1671.

Narváez, Mario, "La teoría de la definición en Leibniz, Spinoza y Tschirnhaus", Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Nº46, Vol. 1, 2020, pp. 109-129.

https://doi.org/10.36446/rlf2020202

Nyden-Bullock, Tammy, "Radical Cartesian Politics: Velthuysen, De la Court and Spinoza," en Studia Spinozana, Vol. 15, Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2006, pp. 35-65.

Parkinson, George H.R., "Leibniz's Paris Writing in Relation to Spinoza" en Leibniz a Paris (1672-1676), Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, vol. 18, no. 2, Wiesbaden, Felix Steiner Verlag, 1978, pp. 73-89.

Ramsay, Andrew M., "Appendix to the Foregoing Work Containing a Refutation of the First Book of Spinoza's Ethics by Which the Whole Structure Is Undermined," en The Philosophical Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion, Unfolded in a Geometrical Order, Glasgow, Robert Foulis, 1748, pp. 425-541.

Regius, Johannes, Cartesius verus spinozismus architectus, Amstelodami, B. Lakeman, 1723.

Spinoza, Baruch, Obras Completas. Biografías, trad. Antonio Domínguez, Madrid, ViveLibro, 2015.

Spruit, Leen y Totaro, Pina (eds.), The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica, Leiden/Boston, Brill, 2011.

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210578

Stenonis, Nicolai, "Ad novae philosophiae reformatorem de vera philosophia epistola," en Meyer, W. (ed.), Chronicon Spinozanum, vol. 1, 1921, pp. 31-43.

Solé, Jimena, Spinoza en Alemania (1670-1789). Historia de la Santificación de un Filósofo Maldito, Córdoba, Brujas, 2011.

Stein, Ludwig, Leibniz und Spinoza, Berlin, G. Reimer, 1890.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111637402

Thomasius, Jakob, "Adversus anonymum, de libertate philosophandi," en Thomasius, Christian (ed.), Dissertationes LXIII, Halæ Magdeburgicæ, Johannis Friderici Zeitleri, 1670/1693, pp. 571-584.

Tschirnhaus, E. Walther von, Medicina mentus sive Tentamen genuinæ Logicæ, Amstelædami, Apud Albertum Magnum, & Joannem Rieuwerts Juniorem, 1687.

Toland, John, Letters to Serena, London, Bernard Lintot, 1704.

Vernière, Paul, Spinoza et la pensée française avant la Révolution, Paris, PUF, 1954.

Versé, Nicolas Antoine de. L'Impie convaincu ou Dissertation Contre Spinosa dans laquelle on réfute les fondements de son athéisme, Amsterdam, Crélie, 1684.

Wachter, Johann G., Elucidarius cabalisticus, sive reconditae Hebraeorum philosophiae brevis et succincta recensio, Rome, 1706. [Facsímil en Schröder, W. (ed.), Freidenker der europäischen Aufklärung, vol. I-2, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog, 1995].

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Jabase, L. (2025). The Cartesian Dispute as a Key to Study the Philosophical Relationship between Spinoza and Leibniz. Ideas. Revista De filosofía Moderna Y contemporánea, (22), 116–152. https://doi.org/10.69498/ri.2025.22.554

Issue

Section

Articles